[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: marx chokes
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: marx chokes
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:18:49 -0600
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:21:06 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <VlU7tB.A.ITD.pq1WCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
Malcolm:
What was the value of your chokes? I would like to try this idea as well.
Digi-Key stocks a large number of iron core chokes.
Dr. Resonance
>
>
> Use chokes instead of resistors. The benefits: much faster and more
> efficient charging (far less resistive loss). As to the values,
> mileage varies. There is balance between charge time and sufficiently
> high impedance at discharge time. I built two working Marx banks,
> both of which used chokes wound on ferrite rods. I spoeculated at the
> time that suitably sizing the components might allow resonant
> charging at mains or some other nominated frequency but pursuing the
> idea is way down my list of things to do.
>
> Malcolm
>
>
>