[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: An internal primary
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: An internal primary
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:03:10 -0600
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Old-return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Resent-date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:05:10 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <avUh6D.A.O7D.5dsVCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Daniel A. Kline" <daniel_kline@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:37 AM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: An internal primary
> Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tesla did.
> The very first Tesla coils were NT running his high frequency
> into standard laboratory induction coils.
> Many of these coils had a core that could be slid in and out. After
> removing the core NT noted the coil still operated (due to
> HF) and this lab
> induction coil was a sec coil wound around a small large dia
> wire pri coil.
> Dr. Resonance
So, a bipolar coil could maybe have an internal primary...?