[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tungsten carbide magnetic?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: tungsten carbide magnetic?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:43:41 -0600
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Old-return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Resent-date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:49:59 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <Dbd8jD.A.f9B.dkpVCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Mike" <mike.marcum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I've heard thoriated rods are a bad choice for a gap, not just for
radioactive reasons. The thorium is added to make the rods arc more
consistently in a welder. If that's the case, won't these make for a TC gap
that has poor quenching?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: tungsten carbide magnetic?
Original poster: Lee Kohlman <lwkksw@xxxxxxxxx>
I am designing a static spark gap using 1/8" tungsten welding rods (yes,
thoriated but to be used outside). I have access to phenolic fiberglass
to support them. I have a total of 10 rods that I would like to lay
parallel and still have some way to adjust gap length. Of course I would
love to build a SRSG but that's too involved for now. Any suggestions?
Original poster: BunnyKiller
but do you need that extra diameter? I am using 1/8" dia pure welding
tungsten no thorium ( and you know what power Im dealing with ;) ...
and have very little wear and erosion problems.. plus the minimal
diameter makes it easier on disc design and dwell time...