[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: capacitance of homemade caps



Original poster: "Steven Steele" <sbsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

forget it. it's just something i thought i'd do if i could. I cewrtainly don't need it. I just got my MMCs today anyway. plus I think i'm just gonna start the whole darned thing over cuz it's beginning to seem like a lost cause with my curren, multilayered TC. I don't even know what i'm doing anymore! The whole thing is stressing me out so instead of trying to figure this one out on my own, i'm gonna start over with Dr. Resonance's M-20 because I know that works.
Then I don't know what the heck i'm gonna do after that.


                   Steven Steele
by the way, here's some pics of my stuff, including the caps:

http://www.angelfire.com/weird2/customsteele/pics/
















----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:31 PM Subject: Re: capacitance of homemade caps


Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 7 Apr 2005, at 8:50, Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "Steven Steele" <sbsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I've tried using  function generator and an o-scope. the function
> generator doesn't have enough voltage to charge the caps. Don't worry,
> I won't plug it into the wall. ;) I think I'll just wrap the wire
> aroudn the pipe. :) Thanks.

What exactly do you mean by "charge the caps"? If you are expecting
them to be charged up to some DC voltage forget it. A function
generator puts out LV AC. At this point it might be helpful if you
post a picture of the circuit you are trying to implement and some
photos of the equipment you are trying to build. A picture speaks
louder than partial descriptions. Again I think some basic electrical
theory would be rather helpful to you.

Malcolm

>      Steven Steele
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> To:
> <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 12:04 AM Subject:
> Re: capacitance of homemade caps
>
>
> >Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Hi Steve,
> >
> >One "can" measure capacitance and inductance with just a scope.  But
> >it is not at all simple.  You pulse it and watch to see how fast it
> >discharges across a resistor.  I don't think it is worth trying
> >unless you have someone there that knows the technique well...  Best
> >to look around for someone that has a meter that just "tells" you
> >such things...  Needs a signal generator and some good knowledge of
> >impedances...  It is just too messy for a first time scope user...
> >
> >You have mentioned 833Hz which seems way way too low...  Maybe like
> >83300Hz...  MMCs are real easy since it is just printed on the side
> >of the cap ;-)))  Might double check the time and voltage scales on
> >the scope...
> >
> >Don't ground your coil to the AC wall plug!!  That ground is great
> >for 60Hz stuff, but terrible at say 83kHz!!!  you might fry
> >everything on the circuit.  Ground the coil to a little ground rod
> >which is like 1000X better!!  cold water pipe or copper drain pipes
> >are great too.  Higher frequencies just don't like to travel in the
> >normal household grounding that was never made for such high
> >frequencies.
> >
> >There are some folks that "flush" some bare wire down the toilet to
> >get to the sewer pipes which are very well grounded...  Sort of
> >"extreme", but "electrically" sound ;-))  Might not be good at the
> >top floor of a tall building ;-))
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >         Terry
> >
> >
> >
> >At 06:13 PM 4/6/2005, you wrote:
> >>Thanks. I am indeed already getting  some MMCs, I just think it
> >>would be cool to have it running off  the strorag boxes. :) Seen on
> >>this website: www.angelfire.com/weird2/customsteele/pics/ Also, I've
> >>got an o-scope with abuilt in signal generator at my school, but I
> >>cant get it to do anything with the box caps. I maintain, perhaps
> >>stupidly, that my caps have a minimum voltage requirement and the
> >>function generator simply can't reach that. I could be wrong, but I
> >>don't think so. :)
> >>                                   Steven Steele
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>