[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The toob finally sets...
Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net>
At 07:51 AM 9/13/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>Original poster: "David Trimmell" <humanb-at-chaoticuniverse-dot-com>
>Jim is completely correct. It is amazing what Si devices are up to but
>you cannot beat a vacuum for hardiness. Certainly the solid state is
>most energy efficient in lower power, but higher I don't know. Jim, just
>curious, but where did you get your efficiency comparisons from?
The efficiencies were for power amplifiers in space applications. For lower
frequencies, solid state is MUCH more efficient than 20%, particularly for
constant envelope applications. Look, for instance, at Rutledge's work at
CalTech on Class E amplifiers (85-90% efficiency) using cheap FETs at 7
MHz. There are some folks getting this kind of efficiency at microwave
frequencies, but it's at low output powers (<1 Watt). There is enormous
interest in getting efficient PAs for the wireless telecom industry, since
the transmitter PA in a cellphone is a big chunk of power consumption.
In microwave amps the power converter from bus voltage to using voltage can
have a huge effect on overall efficiency. In a typical TWT, you'd have a
power converter to make the HV (and filament power) that runs around
80-85%. The tube itself is fairly efficient too, also in the 65-70% range,
so the overall package runs around 50%.
Solid state amps (linear) run in the 30% efficiency range (biased Class A
or AB)
>It
>would beinteresting to really compare the relative efficiencies bellow
>1 MHz. There is something about a nice hot vacuum tube; they do heat a
>cabin well in the winter!
>Not too sure if it would be even conceivable to design a comparable
>circuit of the current DRSSTC with a VTTC without becoming even more
>complex (multi stage, etc.)? But if possible you wouldn't have to worry
>about "exploding" Si packages, only the silent death of melting plates!
Or softening seals.....
>Regards,
>
>David Trimmell