[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Secondary winding direction
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Secondary winding direction
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:29:22 -0700
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:30:15 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <VPpzeD.A.2jD.8WNqBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tesla list wrote:
>
> Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For classic TC design the windings do NOT need to be phased.
>
> For third coil (magnifier) designs so experimenters recommending the coils
> be phased, ie, wound in the same direction.
There is no reason for this, unless you want to increase the coupling
coefficient between the primary and secondary coils by using an
Oudin configuration there, where the bottom of the secondary coil is
connected to the "top" of the primary coil, that has its other end
grounded.
Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz