[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SSTC modelling- any math geniuses?
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>
On 24 May 2004, at 11:47, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Steve Conner" <steve.conner-at-optosci-dot-com>
>
> OK I messed up...
>
> I have been corresponding with Richie and I am forced to admit the
> "magnetizing current" model is a good one and the "leakage inductance"
> one is a red herring. The model is described on his website.
>
> We are now working on extending the model to DR/ISSTCs, and trying to
> factor in a quantitative way of dealing with corona loading. We have
> already figured out that the tuned primary works its magic by acting
> as an impedance matching device and can be modelled as an L-match.
>
> Now here is a question for the math geniuses... Can we take the corona
> load impedance, as seen at the top of the resonator, and transform it
> to an equivalent impedance at the base, using the well-known quarter
> wave stub formula:
>
> Zbase=(Zo^2)/Ztop
>
> Where Zo is the characteristic impedance of the "transmission line",
> which I suppose would be sqrt(L/C), L being the secondary inductance
> and C=(Ctoroid+Cself+Ccorona)?
The odd experiment I've done in terminating a resonator with a fixed
resistance suggests the formula holds, at least loosely. That was
some time ago when it was suggested as an explanation for the
behaviour of a large CW coil in terms of blowing fuses and MOSFETs vs
being able to feed a useful amount of power in. Some time around '96
as I recall.
> If so it all becomes rather nice and we can model the ISSTC after
> breakout as an "antenna" with "radiation resistance", being base-fed
> from a "transmitter" through a L-match "antenna tuner" :)))
>
> There is the complication that the corona load varies with power as
> the streamers get longer and hotter, but we'll burn that bridge when
> we come to it :))))
That is the real problem and gets much worse when the streamers
connect with a target.
Malcolm