Re: sphere within a sphere

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com> 




The sphere within a sphere concept has considerable merit.

In the 1940's Van de Graaff and Trump successfully used this concept to of
multi-shells within shells to allow Van de Graaff generators achieve higher
potentials than a single sphere could.  There are several articles published
in the 1940's --- see Physical Review for these articles (Trump, Van de
Graaff, Atta, et al).

Most of the VDGRF concepts were in an insulating gas atmosphere, usually at
3-12 atm.

It would be interesting to see if they apply to resonance transformers
operating in open air.

Dr. Resonance

Resonance Research Corporation
E11870 Shadylane Rd.
Baraboo   WI   53913
 >
 >
 > Yeah, I'll believe it when I read a described
 > theoretical mechanism consistant with the laws of
 > physics.
 >
 > Funny that you could see huge corona and streamers
 > breaking out from the top turns of the secondary.
 > Strange that this guy was able to rediscover this
 > supposedly super efficient topload that everyone
 > overlooked, but apparently knows nothing of the
 > application of an ACR.
 >
 > Plus, even if the nested sphere outperformed a single
 > sphere, it's meaningless to the thousands of us using
 > toroids.
 >
 > The "baloney" LED on my panel is lit.  I smell the
 > strong scent of pseudoscience here.
 >
 > -Brett
 >
 >
 >
 > --- Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> wrote:
 >  > Original poster: "Virtualgod"
 >  > <mike.marcum-at-zoomtown-dot-com>
 >  >
 >  > I'll believe it when I see it. Seems like the outer
 >  > sphere would shield the
 >  > inner and wouldn't make any difference, in tuning or
 >  > output. Maybe if he
 >  > doubles input power (which wasn't mentioned in the
 >  > listing).
 >  > ----- Original Message -----
 >  > From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
 >  > To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
 >  > Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 1:06 AM
 >  > Subject: sphere within a sphere
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >  > Original poster: "steve"
 >  > <steve_vance-at-cablelynx-dot-com>
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Has anyone heard of this.
 >  >  >
 >  >  >
 >  >
 > http://cgi.ebay-dot-com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3804496648
 >  >  >
 >  >  >   To go from 24" to 37" is a big improvement.
 >  >  > I don't see how this could improve spark length
 >  > If the coil was
 >  >  > properly tuned to begin with. Someone please
 >  > enlighten me.
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Steve Vance
 >  >  >
 >  >
 >
<http://fire.prohosting-dot-com/~bonestc/index.htm>http://fire.prohosting-dot-com/~b
 >  > onestc/index.htm
 >  >  >
 >  >  >
 >  >
 >
 >
 >