[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: THOR: First observations on streamer formation (try II)
Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net>
I not sure I believe the equation either. It takes power to make long
streamers. Seems like one can make the secondary voltage arbitrarily large
by making the top load arbitrarily small, ie: Vtop = Vp * sqrt (Cp/Ctop).
Of course as the top load is made smaller, the breakout voltage gets smaller
as well. Maybe to really get that topload voltage, one needs a topload of
certain dimensions that has a certain capacitance and requires a certain Cp
to generate. A certain power is then required to drive the certain Cp. So
now I'm not sure I don't believe the equation?????
You go figure,
Gerry R.
> Original poster: DRIEBEN-at-midsouth.rr-dot-com
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure exactly how this equation is to be applied, but I thought
> the lateset thinking was that the spark length is a non-linear function
> of the voltage output of Tesla coils. We all know that spark length vs
> voltage is affected by a number of factors (electrode shape, frequency,
> atmospheric conditions, ect) so it would seem that it would be about im-
> possible to guage the output voltage of a Tesla coil strictly by its
> output spark length. John Freau's formula states that the spark length
> is directly proportional to the square of the input POWER, not the volt-
> age, and empirical evidence seems to verify this (you basically have to
> quadruple the power input to double the output spark length). Just my
> thoughts.
>
> David Rieben
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Date: Sunday, March 14, 2004 10:37 am
> Subject: Re: THOR: First observations on streamer formation (try II)
>
> > Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net>
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Something is puzzling me about this equation. Lets assume that
> > one has a 30
> > inch spark. 65*30^.7 = 703 volts ??? or is the equation meant to
> > expressvoltage in KV. Also, is the equation 65 * (inches^.7) or
> > (65*inches)^.7The latter would yield 201 volts or would that be 201KV
> >
> > Gerry R
> >
> > > Original poster: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-mgte-dot-com>
> > >
> > >
> > > In the Tesla Coil Construction Guide there is a graph showing
> > Voltage vs
> > > Spark length. It is based on the equation
> > >
> > > Secondary voltage = 65 x inches^0.7
> > >
> > > This is based on past coiler data and is for continuous sparks
> > from the
> > > toroid to a ground point. It appears to work OK but I would
> > like to bring
> > it
> > > up to date if it needs changing.
> > > John Couture
> >
> >
> >
>
>