[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: First observations on streamer formation (try II)
Original poster: Marco.Denicolai-at-tellabs-dot-com
Hi Gerry,
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net>
>
> Marco,
>
> This is cool stuff. Here are my thoughts (i may be repeating some or
> yours):
>
> 1. In single bang mode, log streamer length vs bang energy.
Yes, at least a sort of. It's easier to measure:
N_of_bangs = f(distance,bang_energy, etc.)
Where N_of_bangs is a discrete stochastic variable equal to the number
of bangs needed for arching to a grounded stick, depending on its
distance, bang energy, quench point, etc.
> 2. I presume your RSG is variable speed and the electronics
> maintains sync
> with it. If so, for each pps setting and with the phasing
> optimized (I
> don't know if phasing is applicable in your case), vary the
> number of bangs
> until maximum streamer growth is obtained, log pps, number of bangs,
> streamer growth, and bang energy.
I have no phasing because I charge with DC the primary capacitor. My PPS
boundaries are charging speed (limiting the maximun PPS) and re-ignition
(limiting the minimum PPS)
> 4. Evaluate staggered presentations (don't know if the
> electronics are
> capable of syncing to a staggered RSG. The bang energy in a
> real system may
> not be constant either. (see richie burnett's writeup on this)
What do you precisely mean?
Best Regards