[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Magnifier Primary Capacitors - EQUIDRIVE vs. STANDARD
- To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
- Subject: RE: Magnifier Primary Capacitors - EQUIDRIVE vs. STANDARD
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:13:11 -0700
- In-Reply-To: <8824A7AF2E4BB74BBFE01E2B13EDAAE70271587B-at-tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp-dot-net>
- References: <8824A7AF2E4BB74BBFE01E2B13EDAAE70271587B-at-tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp-dot-net>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:16:18 -0700
- Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
- Resent-Message-ID: <k6aEfB.A.nnG.wkhDAB-at-poodle>
- Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com
Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-twfpowerelectronics-dot-com>
Hi Gary and All,
Dan's post here was sent 8 days late due to a server error. Please
disregard it.
Cheers,
Terry
At 02:14 PM 1/20/2004, you wrote:
>As my recent experiment
>(http://www.pupman-dot-com/listarchives/2004/January/msg01310.html) shows ,
>the tendency for MMC caps to have a residual charge is dependant on
>precisely what type of cap is used. We do not yet understand and are not
>able to predict which caps will develop residual charges. Until we better
>understand this and are able to predict whether or not it will happen, I
>think it's unwise to suggest that others won't be zapped just because you
>haven't been.
>
>Gary Lau
>MA, USA
>
> > Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H" <daniel.h.mccauley-at-lmco-dot-com>
> >
> > I have to agree with the Dr. on this one. On my newer MMCs i don't use
> > any type of resistors anymore and
> > have zero problems with the capacitors and never any residual charge on
> > them as well.
> >
> > Dan