[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRSG Alignment Drift?
Original poster: "Steven Ward" <srward16-at-hotmail-dot-com>
Not only that, but i find that my coil prefers slightly different phasings
depending on the night (perhaps the weather?). Its usually a tiny change
in phasing, but its definately noticable. So using an electronic phase
controller is really the best idea. Get it phase mechanically with the
controllers variac set for maybe 1/2 way. This will allow for anything then.
Steve
>From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject: Re: SRSG Alignment Drift?
>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:32:36 -0700
>
>Original poster: Mddeming-at-aol-dot-com
>
>In a message dated 1/20/04 1:02:27 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes:
>Original poster: "K Wilson" <teslamap-at-hotmail-dot-com>
>
>I'm in the process of designing my first SRSG. I was wondering if there
>will be a need to perform frequent re-alignments. Could I get away with
>manually aligning the electrodes once, then fixing the electrodes and motor
>in place? Avoiding rotating motor mounts or electrodes will simplify the
>design a bit.
>Thanks,
>Kevin Wilson
>
>Hi Kevin,
> The final answer to your question is Maybe. Any system with rotating
> parts subject to vibration is going to need some periodic adjustment.
> (Think automobile timing belt) How frequently depends on how close to
> perfectly balanced, smooth running, tight fitting, and subject to wear
> your particular components are. Will your coil be semi-permanently
> installed in a workshop/lab/garage/barn, or will you be bouncing it
> monthly across country in a pickup truck to various Teslathons, demos,
> etc.? Will you be treating it like a classic show car or a Baja buggy?
> All of these parameters affect your particular answer.
> This is a good case for using a phase-shift controller. The more
> electronic adjustment you have, the less frequent mechanical adjustment
> you need.
>
>Matt D.