[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Primary Cap rms current not a function of frequency
Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-twfpowerelectronics-dot-com>
Hi Bob,
At 08:55 AM 1/15/2004, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I was calculating the rms current in my MMC configuration for various
>break rates.
>
>I was surprised to discover a simple equation for the primary rms current.
>Assuming no R or SG losses, quench at a notch, assuming magic k's
>and ignoring charge current the rms primary current in amperes is given by:
>
>Irms=pi x V x C x (break rate) x (number of primary cycles to quench)
>where V is the charge voltage and C the capacitance in F
>
>For a standard MMC cap of 0.15uF it is 0.113A rms per number of primary
>cycles per 2000V of charge per 120Hz break rate. (0.094A rms for those in
>50Hz flicker land using 100Hz break rates)
>
>The value above means the rms current rating of 13.5Arms of the cap will
>not be exceeded unless the coupling is very low or the break rate much
>higher than 120Hz. In any case the current rating may be at 85C.
>
>WoW I think this means you can have break rates of 1000Hz with out frying
>the caps with 1st notch quench I should add.
In general, the RMS current is proportional to the BPS rate given the same
primary cap size and firing voltage. But I am not quite sure what you
conditions are here.
>
>How close to or over rated can the maximum allowed peak current and dvt
>of the cap spec be pushed for reasonable (in home TC service) life given
>the rms current is not a limiting factor.
In general, the cap makers give a margin of SQRT(2)X (twice the
heating). But they DO have bad days... I would not exceed RMS current or
dV/dT ratings. We certainly know that exceeding those ratings can
completely destroy the whole cap.
>
>Comments please.
>
>I still need to double check the above but I thought I would bounce it of
>the group first.
It would certainly be a new and cool equation!! Hope it works out!!
Cheers,
Terry
>
>Bob
>
>