[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Secondary size
Original poster: "Luke" <Bluu-at-cox-dot-net>
Not that I intend to but if a very small dia secondary were used would
there be any damage to anything? Or is it only a matter of low out put
based on the inductance ratio issue?
Luke Galyan
Bluu-at-cox-dot-net
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:30 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Secondary size
Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>
Keep your coilform dia as large as practical. An 8-10 inch dia for even
a
small coil will give much longer sparks due to it's overall higher
inductance ratio (sqr (Ls/Lp). A 2 inch dia. coil won't cut it --- too
low
inducance ratio because IR goes up as the square of the radius.
Dr. Resonance
Resonance Research Corporation
E11870 Shadylane Rd.
Baraboo WI 53913
>
> To: Dr. Resonance
> I have already understood (to some degree) the information you just
> posted.
> You seem to have missed what I was asking.
> I know 4.5:1 works very well. Since this is true I could then use my
> 15KV 60Ma NST, give it a SRSG and a MC of .028 micro farads. Then my
> optimal coil height would be 9" tall right? Providing I use a
secondary
> dia. of 2" I would still be in the 4.5:1 ratio and poof I should fall
> into a good rule of thumb for my coil height. I got it! Thanx!
>
> Ok that was not meant to be sarcastic. I was trying to show you that
> the ratio was not my question as stated in the original question.
There
> were actually a few questions I had. but in reference to the one you
> answered I was aiming somewhere else.
>
> Assuming I use your recommended 4.5:1 ratio. What is a good height
to
> use based on the anticipated arc length? Obviously the 9" tall coil
> might have some problems if say 50" arcs were created.
>
> The question is based on a particular anticipated arc length, what is
a
> good rule of thumb to decide on the HEIGHT of the coil?
>
> After I get this under my belt ill re ask the other questions.
> Thanx
>
> And again I do not mean to sound sarcastic just trying to make a
point
> in order to address my real question.
>
> Luke Galyan
> Bluu-at-cox-dot-net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:01 PM
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Secondary size
>
> Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>
>
>
> An optimum coil height to dia ratio is approx 4.5:1. At values less
> than
> 4.5:1 arcing to primary or strike rails occur on a regular basis. If
> the
> coil is too high the coeff. of coupling is lower and less energy is
> transferred.
> 4.5 : 1 seems to work very well.
>
> The potential output of a resonance transformer is equal to it's gain
> times
> the potential input, ie,
>
> Vout = Vinput peak (1.4 x Erms) x sqr (Ls/Lp) ---- this is
called
> system gain.
>
> Also inductance of a coil is proportional to n^2 (high number of
turns
> works
> good because of this square factor) and also to r^2 (this is the
radius
> of
> the coils geometry). This r squared factor rapidly increases the
> inductance
> (Ls) in big coils so the gain (voltage multiplication factor) is high
> and
> output potential is high.
>
> It's important to note that spark length is more of a function of
> current
> (system power) than potential. To double the spark length in most
> systems
> the power has to be increased by a factor of 4 (2 ^2).
>
> Hope this answers your question.
>
> Dr. Resonance
>
> Resonance Research Corporation
> E11870 Shadylane Rd.
> Baraboo WI 53913
> >
> > I would assume that the height would be based on anticipated arc
> length
> and
> > the dia would simply fall into using what you can to stay in the
> suggested
> > height to width ratio.
> > How do you go about deciding how tall the coil should be based on
the
> arc
> > length?
> > Other than aesthetics what is the method for choosing a secondary
> size?
> > What is the cut off for deciding how short a coil can be with a
given
> > anticipated arc length?
> >
> > It seems there are coils that generate longer arcs than the coil
is
> > high. And since the arcs are referenced to ground it seems that
is
> putting
> > the top load very close to ground with respect to its output. I
know
> that
> > the toroid slash secondary top will be at the same positive or
> negative at
> > any one time as the arc and like charges repel so that is what
keeps
> the
> > arcs from going straight down.
> >
> >
> > Ok also if a height is determined what are the advantages /
> disadvantages
> > for going with the larger diameter coil verses the smaller
diameter?
> Keep
> > in mind that when I say large or small diameter I am talking
about
> staying
> > close to the excepted rule of thumb for height to dia. ratio.
> >
> > Thanx
> >
> > I will be asking lots more questions so bare with me. J
> > Luke Galyan
> > Bluu-at-cox-dot-net
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>