[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SRSG or ARSG

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: SRSG or ARSG
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:25:21 -0700
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:33:29 -0700
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <w_w-VB.A.cCG.IHdBAB-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com 

In a message dated 1/13/04 9:36:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes:


>May ask why exactly an ASRG is bad for an NST?


ASRG can be used, but must not be run to slow or the
voltage may go to high for the NST if a suitable safety gap
and protective filter is not used.  However the spark lengths
will probably be poor.  A small value cap must be used, which
will not permit the NST to deliver much power.  Many folks
run the ASRG slow at times without adequate protection
and destory the NST.  Only 120 bps sync will give the
ultimate in spark length performance with NSTs it seems.

John

Prev by Date: Re: Secondary size
Next by Date: Re: Pri/Sec Insulation for maggy
Prev by thread: Re: SRSG or ARSG
Next by thread: RE: SRSG or ARSG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread