Re: Fwd: [jlnlabs] TESLA COIL REVISED6

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: Bart Anderson <classi6-at-classictesla-dot-com> 

Hello Harvey,

Thanks for sharing this project!
It was very interesting to read through. I'm not about to preclude if 
you'll see an increase in q or not. It will be of interests to know what 
occurs for the opposition case.

Keep us informed!
Take care,
Bart

Tesla list wrote:

>Original poster: Harvey Norris <harvich-at-yahoo-dot-com>
>
>So... somewhat having lost my train of thought here
>can anyone forcast what will happen when
>
>A) We construct a tesla secondary in the bipolar
>manner where the secondary is horizonal and the
>Primary is spiralled outwards from the middle
>reference point of the coils wire length. In these
>conditions a node is forced into the midpoint of the
>coil, and we then instead base the R(f) of the
>secondary as an aproximation made by the half
>wavelength, instead of a quarter wavelength
>calculation which is the approximation made for the
>primary being at the base of the secondary.
>
>B) We instead cut the coil in half and then place a
>conventional designed quarter wavelength primary
>instead between the coils.
>
>Since a half wave calculation for twice the wire
>yeilds the same results as a quarter for half the
>wire, both methods produce the same value for R(F)
>
>My thinking is that the above examples are magnetic
>fields in unity and not opposition. The opposition
>cases are not normally explored because it is
>"illogical." But what I am suggesting here is that two
>identically operating TC's polarity wise might have
>the net effect of increasing each secondaries q
>factor. That would be a design that is not ordinarily
>explored, because the bipolar terminals would not arc
>to each other.
>
>