[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The 1500t secondary myth
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: The 1500t secondary myth
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:20:33 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:27:40 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <QKsGzC.A.ebH.q5gxBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Tom Luttrell PWRCOM" <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
One of the other reasons I went for the larger cap bank was to prevent
resonant voltage rise destroying my NST.
Also I did not want to rebuild the primary with more turns as the
existing one was/is a major structural part of the coil base.
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> I'm thinking that maybe you should have left the primary tank
> cap the same since its value is determined by how much your
> power source can charge.
> When you went from 750 turns to 1100 turns, you would then
> reaquire tuning by adding more primary turns.
>
> Gerry R.