[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 18,000. AMP high energy Cap bank
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 18,000. AMP high energy Cap bank
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 11:04:06 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 11:10:22 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <9vEvMB.A.qpH.KKHxBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: 18,000. AMP high energy Cap bank
> Original poster: FIFTYGUY@xxxxxxx
>
> In a message dated 12/17/04 9:14:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >> How does one limit these current levels? If a energy discharge cap
> >> system has an ultimate safe rating of (say) 20kA, how does one make
sure
> >> that current isn't exceeded during an experiment that vaporizes a
specimen?
>
> Don't forget that this is a linear system... You can charge the capacitor
> to a lower voltage, close the switch and measure the currents with a
> conventional oscilloscope. Then just scale.
>
> Is it still a linear system if you vaporize a wire, or discharge
> through a gas tube? Are small vaporizations linear to higher-energy ones?
> Or is a good hefty chunk of copper pipe (or other low-inductance load that
> will survive) a good "worst case short circuit" to presume and work
> backward from there?
>
The latter... your goal is to avoid destruction of components, so you worst
case the load: a short circuit, or a wire comparable to the length of the
wire you're exploding.