[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Use of Tantulums - DRSSTCs
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Use of Tantulums - DRSSTCs
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:58:07 -0700
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:06:01 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <mL596B.A.MGB.XdjtBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "McCauley, Daniel H" <daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
Just because something cost a lot doesn't mean an engineer designed it
properly.
Dan
>I once paid about AUD$1000 for 2 service techs to drive 300K
>and spend a
>day dismantling a colour doppler echocardiograph machine of
>mine. Out of
>all the 50 or so boards they tracked down the fault by the 'follow the
>trail of smoke test' to a faulty tantalum. They got a new one
>for less
>than $1. They did not have nice things to say about Tantalums in aging
>equipment as it is a common problem apparently.
>The Echo machine cost $AUD 250,000 10 years before I inherited it. It
>weighs 300kg, has 15 cooling fans and a 1400W power supply.
>Of course the
>current model is hand luggage suitcase size, far more advanced
>but still
>costs $100,000.
>Peter