[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The 1500t secondary myth (long)
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: The 1500t secondary myth (long)
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:16:16 -0700
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:18:00 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <x8EdxC.A.GoE.b3nsBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Bert Pool <bert.tx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-Phil LaBudde posted:
[big snip]
I'm especially interested in how Richard Hull got such good performance
out of an exceptionally small resonator, and why nobody has duplicated this.
Phill, it has been duplicated.
When I built my best magnifier, I went to Richmond, looked at Hull's coil,
measured, photographed, and stole Richard's methods like a pirate. I
pretty much duplicated Richard Hull's 11E magnifier, and I used the same 4"
by 14" resonator he used, and got similar results. But I have to admit my
toroid configuration did not match the same degree of field shaping as
Richard's and my coil eventually failed. On extreme coils such as the
11-E, electrostatic field shaping with the proper array of sheet metal
cones and toroids is absolutely essential.
Want an efficient, amazing coil? Here's the secret in one sentence: follow
Richard's lead - outrageous top loads, very high voltage potential
transformers, small capacitors, and most importantly, very good 8 point
series rotary gaps.
Bert Pool