[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The 1500t secondary myth (long)
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: The 1500t secondary myth (long)
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:22:50 -0700
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:36:31 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <Pj5PSC.A.JtF.z89rBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
That's the coil "down-under" and our continuing contract forbids me to
divulge photos or locations. I could get sued and that's one boat I'm not
climbing into. I will respect the privacy request (formal contract) of my
client.
Dr. Resonance
>
> >Thanks for calling this to my attention Steve.
> >
> >I don't know how 120 ft. got in there but we will dispense with it.
> >
> >We did do a continuous coil at 65 ft with an occassional stray streamer
> >hitting the vertical post on the ground stand at 71 ft. That was max.
Not
> >75 ft though. We were running at 185 kVA and started severely
overheating
> >our air-cooled reactor even with the fan running.
>
> That would beat Wysock's by 11 feet!!! Any pictures, details, etc??
>
> Cheers,
>
> Terry