[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LTR cap BPS?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: LTR cap BPS?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 07:52:51 -0700
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 07:53:48 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <m60I5C.A.7pH.8rdrBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
Gary:
With the 4/20 setup, which cap provided the best performance from your sec
coil?
Dr. Resonance
>
> The BPS of a static gap is whatever it "needs to be", determined by the
> gap width, cap size, and power supply. Sorry to be so vague, but there
> is no specific target number, and it's not related to mains-resonance.
> Lower figures generally result from higher C values and/or higher
> voltages, resulting in greater bang sizes and better performance. From
> a post I submitted last year:
>
> I just measured the BPS of my mini coil, using a partially-deshunted
> 4/20 NST. Using a digital storage scope, I scoped the field coming off
> the secondary over a 400 msec interval with a scope probe hanging about
> 8 feet from the coil. I tried 3 different cap sizes:
> Cap BPS
> .012uF 297 BPS
> .02uF 207 BPS
> .025uF 157 BPS
>
> Regards, Gary Lau
> MA, USA
>
> > Original poster: "Black Moon" <black_moons@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi, I was wondering, when using a LTR cap an a NST, is your break rate
> > spost to be around 60? is the resonant action what causes it not to be
> 120+?
>
>
>