[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: THOR Bang energy vs. streamer length measured
Original poster: "Denicolai, Marco" <Marco.Denicolai-at-tellabs-dot-com>
Hi Terry,
Yes, I understand what are you driving at. I just don't believe anymore
in the black box paradigm, where the more energy (or energy feed rate,
the power) you use the longer streamer you get out. I think the extra
(average) power will just go into more heat or more on-time, not more
length.
I see it as follows. If you switch a light on and off 3 times a second
instead of once a second you won't get a brighter light, just the same
intensity light on for a longer time.
We can't measure the energy fed to the streamer by its length alone. The
same length can conduct a different amount of current, with a different
waveform, different RMS value, etc. That is, the same length can account
for a different amount of consumed average power.
Therefore I would be glad if you could perform also a set of
measurements with the same charging voltage but different BPS.
Best Regards
> I was thinking that if I charge say a 10uF cap to 200 volts,
> then the bang energy would be 0.2 joules. At say 100 BPS
> the coil input power would be 20 watts. At 1000 BPS it would
> be 200 watts... So the streamer length would naturally
> increase just due to the higher input power.
>
> However, if at 1000BPS, I ran the cap voltage at 63.25 volts,
> the power would still be 20 watts input. Then, any increase
> in streamer length would be just due to the change in BPS.
>
> Then you could have a streamer length Vs. BPS graph of a coil
> with a constant input power. Such a graph would just show
> the effects of BPS on streamer length. One would have to
> account for some losses and switching voltage drops...
>
> Does this sound reasonable??
>
> It would be easy to do the constant cap voltage test too...
>
> I will try and determine what size power supply would be best
> and see if I can find one cheap...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Terry
>
>
>
>
>