[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: THOR Bang energy vs. streamer length measured

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: THOR Bang energy vs. streamer length measured
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:12:57 -0600
Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:13:40 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <OOSYqC.A.jpG.ftGCBB-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net> 

Hi Steve,

Why (bang energy*120),  unless you are still at 120BPS.  The original
formula was based on wall power and not processed power (ie, bang energy *
BPS).  I personally prefer pocessed power but I suspect the 1.7 would
change.

Gerry R.

 > Original poster: "Steve Conner" <steve.conner-at-optosci-dot-com>
 >
 > Old equation: Spark length=1.7 * sqrt(power) Only valid at 120bps
 >
 > New equation: Spark length=1.7 * sqrt(Bang energy*120)

Prev by Date: Re: Micro SSTC + light bulb = plasma globe. Safe( xrays ) ?
Next by Date: RE: Micro SSTC + light bulb = plasma globe. Safe?
Prev by thread: Re: THOR Bang energy vs. streamer length measured
Next by thread: RE: THOR Bang energy vs. streamer length measured
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread