[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: deceptive transformer

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: deceptive transformer
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:45:16 -0700
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:50:48 -0700
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <p0KWj.A.9EC.7c2aAB-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: Hauke Johannknecht <ash-at-ash.de> 

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Tesla list wrote:

 > Original poster: "Richard W." <potluckutk-at-comcast-dot-net>

 > But it is rated about 800 volts above the average MOT. Still, I wouldn't bid
 > on it for that rating and certainly not worth 66 buck in my opinion.  Nor

anyone noticed that the 2800V sound a lot like the Upeak of a
regular 2000V Urms MOT? or did i miss something?

 >  > http://cgi.ebay-dot-com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3805950083.

MfG,
   Hauke

Prev by Date: Re: strange vttc
Next by Date: Measurement with Voltage Divider (was: strange vttc)
Prev by thread: Re: deceptive transformer
Next by thread: RE: deceptive transformer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread