[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Redesigning/tuning a coil
Original poster: "Lau, Gary" <gary.lau-at-hp-dot-com>
Hi Michael:
My comments interspersed:
>Original poster: pepperman-at-SoftHome-dot-net
>
>Hello, I'm new to this forum; I've been devouring backposts from
>the archives lately, and I really enjoy this valuable resource. I
>recently was offered the chance to tune up an existing Tesla coil,
>and I jumped at the chance...I would like to build one soon, but time
>and resources may not allow me to, so this seems like a pretty
>good opportunity. However, I have to get as much done as I can
>by Wednesday, because I'll be leaving the area then. I've checked
>out the coil, and am making some recommendations to my contact
>on what to change; I'd appreciate any comments to let me know if
>my ideas are on-target, or if you see something you think I should
>change.
>The current setup (all inch measurements are approximate):
>
>15/60 NST
>
>Primary: about 19 turns of insulated wire, I'd guess around AWG 12
>or 14, 18" diameter bundle
>
>Secondary: 8.75" OD, 36.5" wound length, 1500-1550 turns of
>AWG 22 varnished wire
>
>Topload: currently either a metal bowl upside-down over the top or
>a 8" x 23" toroid of aluminum flex ducting
The toroid size sounds good, and the toroid is much better than the
metal bowl!
>main cap: 16.2 nF (6 caps in parallel, each 2.7 nF -at- 40 kV--the
>doorknob type, probably ceramic)
>
>Spark gap: a single gap using several nails
The gap sounds like a weak spot in the design. The electrodes should be
rounded, not pointy, and thermally massive so a hot spot does not
develop at the point of arcing. Forced airflow through the gap arc
generally improves performance by a large margin. A pair of parallel
copper pipes will work much better.
>Ground: I'm not sure if he has a good ground--I don't think so
>
>My main ideas for improvement based on what I've read here:
>-switch the primary to 1/4" bare copper tubing, around 12-14 turns
>to allow for plenty of flexibility when tuning, in a cone angled at 30
>degrees for better coupling
There is no need to make a conical primary. A flat one will provide
adequate coupling and have better clearance to the top load. Too much
coupling may result from a conical primary - more is not always better.
>-build a new toroid, 6" x 26" (aluminum flex ducting)
>-main cap: see if I can persuade him to try something else, since I
>know the doorknob caps are really lossy and their C changes with
>temperature
>-spark gap: an RQ/TCBOR style multiple spark gap
>-connect a good ground
>
>Main questions:
>-Will the 6" x 26" ducted toroid be too big for this coil? I was also
>considering 5" x 20", but someone my contact talked to said it only
>comes in the even sizes, e.g. 4" and 6" but no 5", so I figured the 6"
>was better than trying 4". I thought this was strange, since many
>people have mentioned 5", but perhaps they weren't using ducting.
>Any thoughts on how appropriate this size is?
>
>-How acceptable are the ceramic doorknob caps? I know they're
>not the greatest, but I'm thinking we may just stick with them, since
>we already have plenty, and replacing them would cost a fair
>amount. Also, the current C seems pretty reasonable; any
>recommendations on either front?
The capacitance seems OK, although I use a 20nF with my 15/60. As far
as doorknob suitability, your mileage may vary... Some are better than
others, but none are as good as a good polypropylene cap.
>
>-The coil is currently located underground in a large warehouse-
>style area (though I don't know if it'll stay there), so driving a
>grounding rod isn't feasible--would connecting the ground to
>structural steel members be acceptable? (I don't think the water
>pipes would be a good idea, as they're connected to the normal
>electrical ground--is the structural steel also connected to the
>electrical ground?)
The choice of ground will have very little impact on performance; it
mostly affects how much RF get back into your power mains. I think
connecting to the steel frame is a good idea.
>
>Any other thoughts/comments?
>
>Thanks!
>Michael Johnson
Regards, Gary Lau
MA, USA