[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: deceptive transformer



Original poster: "Hydrogen18" <hydrogen18-at-hydrogen18-dot-com> 

No, please dont say it's so! They even put switching psu's in MO's now? Are
the magnetrons designed for the HF also?

---Eric
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: deceptive transformer


 > Original poster: "Virtualgod" <mike.marcum-at-zoomtown-dot-com>
 >
 > That's not gonna help the price either with mots going extinct. Anyone try
 > making a dc resonant coil with one of those inverter supplies yet? Freq is
 > probably way too high to make the usual ac coil practical (no 50,000 bps
 > caps to be found).
 > ----- Original Message -----
 > From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
 > To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
 > Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 12:11 PM
 > Subject: Re: deceptive transformer
 >
 >
 >  > Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net>
 >  >
 >  > Also, trash picking or consumer electronics dismantling  as well as
 > storing,
 >  > packing, and shipping, takes time.  One does pay for convenience and/or
 >  > time.
 >  >
 >  > Actually, though, the intriguing thing about the newer microwaves is
the
 >  > inverter power supply!
 >  >
 >  > ----- Original Message -----
 >  > From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
 >  > To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
 >  > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 4:40 PM
 >  > Subject: RE: deceptive transformer
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >  > Original poster: "Steve Conner" <steve.conner-at-optosci-dot-com>
 >  >  >
 >  >  >  >66$ for a mot is cheap.  New MOTs are 80-100$ AFAIK
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Last time I looked, it was possible to buy a brand new microwave
oven
 > for
 >  > 35
 >  >  > UK Pounds. That's about $52. In fact it's probably less, since
consumer
 >  >  > electronics are often "dollar for pound."
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Still, I don't blame (much) the seller for trying to make a buck, I
 > blame
 >  >  > the poor gimp who paid $66 for a transformer he could have bought
brand
 >  > new
 >  >  > for $52, or trash-picked for free. Caveat emptor etc. It's not
really
 > any
 >  >  > worse than paying $100 for a pair of sneakers that cost $5 to
 > manufacture
 >  > in
 >  >  > Thailand...
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Steve C.
 >  >  >