[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PlasmaSonic II tweaking
Original poster: humanb-at-chaoticuniverse-dot-com
Thanks for the H-bridge analogy, now I get it! It is
pretty darn simple. The trick is making sure nothing
skips a beat; otherwise ya got a train wreck.
Well I changed secondary coils last night and am now
getting much louder and better audio. I inserted my
coil from my Tube rig and retuned to the lower
frequency (low 200khz’s). I do need to add some C to
help bypass the RF into audio line in, as it keeps
knocking my CD player off-line… But I think I am
getting close to modulated Plasma nirvana! Stereo is
indeed the next step. I love it when people comment on
the smell of Ozone on my clothing!
Regards,
David
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:14:19 -0500, "Mccauley, Daniel
H" wrote:
>
>
> Yes, a few have tried this including myself. However,
> I was never able
> to get the volume compared to using the PWM
> modulation on the PlasmaSonic. If you did have a
> suitable transformer
> capable of swinging almost the entire full-bridge
> rail, then you might get pretty good performance!!!
>
> Indeed you are correct. Plate modulation is the holy
> grail of VTTC
> plasma audio dynamics. This was proved by Sue Gaeta
at
> Ed Wingate's teslathon back in 2002. Very nice
set-up,
> although it
> required a lot of equipment. One set-up for the plate
> modulator and
> another set-up for the VTTC. But it was very clean
> sounding and the
> audio sounded quite good.
>
> Not sure by what you mean with a pure-unmodulated RF ?
> ? ?
>
> H-Bridges are EXTREMELY SIMPLE!!!! Here is an
exercise
> i give to
> everyone who asks that same question about how they
> work. Draw your H-Bridge circuit on a piece of
paper.
> Replace all the
> FETs with switches and neglect all other components
> except for the
> output load.
>
> So you should have an upper rail, lower rail, 4 FETs
> and the output
> connected between the FETs on both legs.
>
> Now close the switches in the following manner, look
at
> your load, and
> you will see right away what the voltage is at each
> instance.
>
> Switch Instance 1: Upper Left and Lower Right Switch
> Closed, Upper
> Right and Lower Left Switch Opened
> Switch Instance 2: Upper Right and Lower Left Switch
> Closed, Upper
> Left and Lower Right Switched Opened
> REPEAT . . .
>
> Voila!
>
> Dan
>
>
> > Dan, anyone ever try to modulate a SSTC using a
> series modulation
> > transformer? Similar to VT plate mod. ??? Just
> curious. Now I was told
> > many years ago that one could never get (AUDABLE)
> audio using
> > a grid to
> > mod a VTTC. I proved that incorrect. I still think
> that with your
> > success with the PlasmaSonic you should still
> continue the Plate
> > modulated VTTC. I always Knew grid mod was
difficult,
> but it
> > does work.
> > But plate mod may be the holly grail of Vacuum
plasma
> audio
> > dynamics? I
> > have once heard the great discharge of a AM radio
> station tower, so I
> > know that decent plasma to air, audio dynamics
> exists. But yes, I will
> > slowly progress to the second Plasmasonic, without
> > (hopefully) more FET
> > deaths...
> >
> > What mods would it take to get pure un-modulated RF?
> I am still trying
> > (failing?) to understand a H-Bridge! Could one use a
> 555?
> >
> > Thanks for any assistance.
> >
> > David Trimmell
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mccauley, Daniel H
> [mailto:daniel.h.mccauley-at-lmco-dot-com]
> > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 8:57 AM
> > To: humanb-at-chaoticuniverse-dot-com
> > Subject: RE: PlasmaSonic II tweaking
> >
> >
> > You need to build another plasmasonic. For a
variety
> of reasons:
> >
> > 1. One cannot appreciate the stereo imaging and
> point source imaging
> > created from two stereo PlasmaSonics.
> > Its unbelievable
> >
> > 2. Two PlasmaSonics will increase your overall
> volume by 3dB
> > (factor of
> > 2)
> >
> > 3. More ozone, the better!
> >
> > 4. More RF. RF is good! Also, the UV light from
> the arcs
> > provide nice
> > suntans and burns in the wintertime!
> >
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > > Audio volume isn't bad I just want more! I think
> with
> > > much more tweaking I can get up a bit. Also, was
> > > wondering just how tight I can get the coupling,
or
> if
> > > there would be problems with over-coupling like
> > > frequency spliting? Oh, another question, what is
> the
> > > current capacity of the main rails on the board, I
> am
> > > curious as to how much current I sent through it
to
> > > blow it up?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:35:48 -0500, "Mccauley,
> Daniel
> > > H" wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nice video. Sounds pretty good as well,
although
> i
> > > > can't really tell
> > > > how loud it is.
> > > >
> > > > Dan
> > >
> >
> >