Re: New Neon Transformers

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Dr. Resonance by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>


Good idea.  I don't see why not.

Dr. Resonance

Resonance Research Corporation
E11870 Shadylane Rd.
Baraboo   WI   53913
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: New Neon Transformers


 > Original poster: "Lau, Gary by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<Gary.Lau-at-hp-dot-com>
 >
 > Would it be possible to take the CT connection out to a 3rd terminal
 > without tying it to the core?  One could then tie the CT to RF ground, and
 > tie the core to mains-ground.  This would permit a primary strike to be
 > safely drained to RF ground while minimizing RF coupling to the
 > primary.  The core to inner-secondary winding insulation need only hold
off
 > whatever the RF ground transients are.
 >
 > Gary Lau
 > MA, USA
 >
 > Original poster: "Dr. Resonance by way of Terry Fritz
 > <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>
 >
 > They will be CT grounded like a standard NST.  I'm also going to only
 > "gently" glue the current limiting section of the core in place so
 > experimenters can move it and set current where they want it.  I will
 > suggest the moveable leg be epoxied solidly into place before full power
 > operation.
 >
 > Dr. Resonance
 >
 >   > Are these center tapped? If so, is the center tap isolated from the
core?
 >   > Any info on the maximum voltage the innermost end of the winding can
take
 >   > versus the core on the core and coil config?
 >   > --
 >
 >