[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spark Gap VI Scope Capture
Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>
Hi Jim,
I tuned in the inductor to less inductance to get higher currents:
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-01.jpg
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-02.CSV
Still have the dip in the average voltage level here at ~125 amps too.
Sure seems odd that the voltage would have this offset and I see that it
did not return to zero in this faster time frame... Hmmmm...
I pulled out the "fabulous" Jennings vacuum capacitor divider HV probe and
go this:
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-03.jpg
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-04.jpg
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-05.CSV
A ton of odd noise now (not sure what is "true"...) But look how straight
the average voltage level is!!!
So I pulled out the Terry's plane wave antenna and pointed it the the probe
top:
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-06.jpg
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-06.jpg
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-08.CSV
Still NOT seeing that average voltage dip...
I note you mention that "maybe the voltage probe system is a bit
overcompensated". Hey... I "wonder" how the probe compensation could
possibly be "off" :o)))
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/2003-05-20-09.jpg
I sure hope "R4" does not need any adjustment ;-)))
Cheers,
Terry
At 01:59 PM 5/20/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>Once I low pass filtered/decimated the data, it looks like V and I line up
>quite nicely. The V transients are right at the I zero crossings.
>
>The overall baseline shift during the pulse is interesting. I wonder if
>it's just representative of some AC coupling. Essentially you've got
>3000V, then zero volts, (ignoring the LC ringing and transients)and maybe
>the voltage probe system is a bit overcompensated so you're getting
>negative overshoot.
>The overshoot looks like about 10%, peak.
>
>The little spikes at the beginning of each conduction interval might be
>the resonance of the spark gap wiring etc, that you observed in frequency
>domain several years ago. The overshoot looks like about 80-100%, and it's
>real fast, so it might also be a probe compensation artifact. Very much
>shorter timescale, though, than the big overshoot mentioned above. It
>could also be a termination thing. When I look at the unfiltered data, the
>overshoot is a lot bigger... 500%, making me think very capacitance
>coupling the edge through.
>
>The final ringing is interesting too.. a much higher frequency (1 MHz?)
>than the other stuff. Perhaps a parasitic in the gap circuit after it has
>finally quenched.
.............