Re: Magnifier conversion

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "robert & june heidlebaugh by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <rheidlebaugh-at-desertgate-dot-com>

Terry; Thank you for your work
     Robert  H
-- 


 > From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
 > Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 21:44:00 -0600
 > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
 > Subject: Magnifier conversion
 > Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
 > Resent-Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 21:45:09 -0600
 >
 > Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>
 >
 > Hi All,
 >
 > Tonight I set up a side by side model comparison of my conventional coil
 > and it's magnifier conversion:
 >
 > http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/NewMag/0502-01.gif
 >
 > The primaries are driven by a 10Vp-p saw tooth wave from a low-Z
 > amplifier.  The top voltage is picked off with a 3pF 220k ohm probe setup.
 >
 > http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/NewMag/0502-02.gif
 >
 > http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/NewMag/0502-03.gif
 >
 > I then set up the real coils and took the real measurements:
 >
 > http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/NewMag/0502-04.jpg
 >
 > http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/NewMag/0502-05.gif
 >
 > http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/NewMag/0502-06.jpg
 >
 > http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/NewMag/0502-07.gif
 >
 > So it looks like things are working just as expected and the models and
 > real coils are matching up very well.  It appears that the RMS power
 > between the two coils is almost identical (no quenching case).  The
 > magnifier does easily reach higher voltages however.
 >
 > Nothing too dramatic but these are pretty carefully done tests and the
 > results should be very accurate so I thought I would report them.
 >
 > Cheers,
 >
 > Terry
 >
 >