[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SSTC idea
Original poster: "Stephen Conner by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <steve-at-scopeboy-dot-com>
At 12:39 15/03/03 -0700, you wrote:
>The cross of which you state is basically saying you want a solid state
>power source instead of the NST and still use a traditional spark gap. This
>has already been done. Its basically just using a high voltage switching
>power supply (Solid State) usually DC and making this the power source.
The best example I've seen of this is Marco DeNicolai's "Thor" system. He
basically built a switched-mode pole pig. Apparently it's not too reliable,
but is anything when you connect it to a Tesla coil? The Thor power supply
is actually very like a giant electronic NST with a HV rectifier stuck on
the end, so maybe you could make a mini-Thor with an electronic NST? I had
a 100 watt unit but it, uh, burnt out somehow...
>However, the more exciting direction to go is to replace the traditional
>spark gap with a solid state version. This would be a definite challenge
I always wonder about this. Would a solid-state gap replacement be any more
efficient than an old-fashioned spark gap? I guess they use them in radar
transmitters for repeatability/jitter reasons but what's the point in a TC?
>I believe though, that a lot of the OLTC (Off-line Tesla Coils) use a
>similar solid state switching arrangement however it is at low voltage
>(<1kV).
That's how mine works at any rate. It's just a DC resonant coil with a pair
of IGBTs dropped in pace of the spark gap.
Steve C.