Re: Dangers of SSTCs ! ! ! Measured

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Bunnykiller by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <bunikllr-at-bellsouth-dot-net>

Tesla list wrote:

>Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" 
><dhmccauley-at-spacecatlighting-dot-com>
>
>This weekend, I borrowed a Narda E-field meter from work to run with my
>coils.
>I took measurements over 100kHz to 1MHz average at a distance of 5 feet
>surrounding the coil.  Although, field strength was well under 100 (V/m) for
>my conventional coils,
>the field strength of my SSTC (tuned) was over 1000 (V/m) ! ! ! !
>Well over
>the IRPA exposure limit of 194 (V/m).  When the SSTC was a bit off tune so
>that just a very small
>corona discharge was visible, the field strength jumped up to well over 3000
>(V/m).  And thats at a distance of 5ft from the resonator.
>
>Maybe SSTCs are a bit more dangerous than we thought . . . !
>
>The Captain
>
>
sheeshhh...     why is it the reall kewl stuff we like to do is bad for us 
??  ;)

Scot D