[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: That other HV List - e-mail servers, computers, spam...
Original poster: "Chip Atkinson by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <chip-at-pupman-dot-com>
I'll comment more on Terry's stuff later, but just a quick note -- there
is also sparc linux. A good compromise! :-)
Chip
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Dave Halliday wrote:
> You seem to have the SUN on order but you may want to consider Linux on
> an Intel or Athlon box - reliability is excellent and there are some
> fantastic e-mail/spam/mailing list applications out there that are not
> ported to Solaris.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions - I have set this up for the place
> where I work (50+ engineers; marine design company) and it has been
> running flawlessly for more than one year. Modest equipment needs
> too...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:41 PM
> > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Cc: chip-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Subject: Re: That other HV List
> >
> >
> > Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>
> >
> > Hi Pete,
> >
> > At 11:13 AM 6/27/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> > >Terry,
> > > I vote to allow all HV topics on this list. I'm
> > interrested in
> > >TCs, induction coils, CW multipliers, Marx generators, and
> > >coin-crushers, and feel that there is enough commonality and
> > >cross-usefulness that it would be a good thing.
> >
> > No one is sure where the other list is at right at the moment
> > ;-) I guess
> > they are still talking about it...
> >
> > I have been allowing those other related high voltage topics
> > lately. The
> > key is that the regular "Tesla stuff" is not generating like
> > 100+ post per
> > day, so there is "room" for the other stuff right now. It
> > has been no
> > problem at all really. The problem would come if the traffic
> > started to
> > really pick up and we start getting very large numbers of
> > mails such that
> > no one could keep up (like me :o)) This spring was very tame
> > compared to
> > previous years when early spring got like 70+ posts per day
> > consistently. So I am just playing it all by ear...
> >
> > I would think that two lists would really be best. I imagine
> > most people
> > would sign up for both and notice little difference other
> > than the reply to
> > addresses. A problem with everything on one list might come
> > in a year or
> > so when say the high voltage list really started to dominate
> > things and
> > Tesla coilers felt they were "second". Then we would have to
> > kick them off
> > "our" list to another anyway :o))
> >
> > A true high voltage group could probably also use a true high voltage
> > moderator that was expert in the high voltage areas other than Tesla
> > coils. There are many high voltage subjects that are pretty
> > far removed
> > from Tesla coils and people that are expert there may not
> > care about coils
> > =:O Take the subject of "lifters". That area has a lot of
> > questions
> > that are pretty removed from what true coilers would care
> > about. And,
> > Lifter folks may have little interest in coils... Two groups
> > would easily
> > handle that situation. Tesla coiling really is a small subset of the
> > "whole world" of high voltage. Personally, I don't think
> > mixing us with
> > the larger world on just one list is a good thing. It is
> > easy to sign up
> > for a few groups of interest, but hard to just filter everything of
> > interest coming in on just one list...
> >
> > If Chip wants to rule the whole world of high voltage (I know
> > he does :o)),
> > I can see running a bunch of lists on say Tesla coils, lifters,
> > electrostatics, crushers.... And people could just sign onto
> > a "check
> > list" of the ones they are specifically interested in... Not
> > sure how
> > messy that would be from his side, but it may be a cool way
> > to work things.
> >
> >
> > In other news... As part of Terry's project "Escape from Microsoft
> > products!!" I am getting a Sun RAQ 550 server to "slowly"
> > replace the
> > present hot-streamer-dot-com computer. The new "big time" server
> > would have
> > many cool features like handling pop3 accounts that could be
> > changed fast
> > to slip away from spammers. Thus, folks could use that for
> > e-mails and not
> > worry with things like AOL problems... And, "I" would not
> > have to worry
> > stripping those "Stop spam now by getting MSN so you only get
> > Microsoft
> > spam that spammers have to pay us to spam you with..."
> > trailers... It also
> > has DNS services so maybe people could have direct Tesla coil
> > sites without
> > the "hot-streamer-dot-com" part in the URL. If bandwidth were to
> > "get bad" I
> > could also just ship the whole thing off to a "big time"
> > server house for
> > wild bandwidths... The RAQ also has full mail list capabilities
> > too >:o)) Still all a ways off, but things are going in that
> > direction
> > here... I have looked at servers for about a year now and
> > Sun RAQ seems by
> > far the best choice for computer dummy "me" to run such
> > things with ;-)) I
> > figure it is better to start things a year before
> > hot-streamer blows up,
> > rather than 5 minutes after :o)) I also note that Pete works
> > for Sun ;-))
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Terry
> >
> >
> >
> >
>