[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 'true" spark length was Re: Desktop Bipolar Coil
Original poster: "Steve Conner by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <steve.conner-at-optosci-dot-com>
Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<Mddeming-at-aol-dot-com>
>the "True"
>length is indeterminate and may be anything greater than the straight line
>distance and less than infinity... TCs are far too
>complex to be able to speak intelligently about single-value performance.
>Hopefully this may help take some of the fuzziness out of the discussion.
Maybe, but it replaced the fuzziness with fractals and chaos, which is even
worse :D All I know is, it's a random thing, so if you graphed probability
of a strike to a rod in time interval T vs. distance of rod from toroid, you
would probably see a Poisson distribution. We ought to be able to use that
to produce a standard spark length parameter. Maybe someone who actually
knows about statistics could help me out here?
http://stat.tamu.edu/stat30x/notes/node70.html#SECTION00435000000000000000
Steve C.