Re: topload questions

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <classictesla-at-netzero-dot-com>

Hi Antonio,

On the 16" x .001" case (107.5 sec  with a detail of 3 and using IE6 on 
900MHz pc). Only 12 sec with the 16" x .01" case. This is internal to geotc.js.

If you select any of the demo's, there is a line of text which is written 
to the output window pertaining to the demo only. For example, if you 
select the demo "C of isolated toroid floating in space", the output window 
(following the analysis) will show:

Running F A N T C using core functions of G E O T C version: 2.2

RUNNING DEMO: Isolated toroid floating in space: (exact => 20.73804 pF)
Computing ..... please wait
System or Object Capacitance: 20.69 pF
Run Complete Time elapsed: 2 secs


The line of text "RUNNING DEMO: ..." is written to the output and pertains 
only to that demos input values. If you change the values to suit your 
needs, the program will still write this line of text for the "first" run. 
However, after that first run, ALL demo checkboxes are cleared and 
consecutive runs will not show this line of text (unless you keep selecting 
a demo as a template). It's just for comparison purposes pertaining to the 
demo values. Obviously, using the demos as templates is good method to use. 
But in that case, simply ignore the demo comparison value.

Take care,
Bart



Tesla list wrote:

>Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz by way of Terry Fritz 
><teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br>
>
>Tesla list wrote:
>
>I am not sure about the precision of the calculations for the thin
>toroids,
>but they agree with what I can measure.
>The "great part" is close to 50%, tending to 41% of the sphere
>capacitance
>for thin wire.
>
>Fantc takes forever to analyze the 16" x 0.001" case, and in all cases
>lists a strange number as "exact value" (why?).
>
>Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz
>
>
>