[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bipolar capacitive transformer/transformerless TC
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br>
Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Jolyon Vater Cox by way of Terry Fritz
<teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <jolyon-at-vatercox.freeserve.co.uk>
>
> I would be interested to know whether the topology below would be any use
> in building either a bipolar "capacitive transformer" TC or
> (with the capacitors C2a and C2b replaced with two inductors both equal to
> half the total inductance of L2) a bipolar "transformerless" TC.
>...
Attempts to use ideal transformers don't work, since they would have
to have too high inductances and unity coupling. With real
transformers, or uncoupled inductors, the two halves are different,
and it's not possible to design your circuit (if possible at all) from
the values or an unbalanced prototype.
A bipolar transformerless coil with capacitive coupling can be:
o--+----2C1----+----2C2---+---+
| | | |
gap L1 L2 C3
| | | |
o--+----2C1----+----2C2---+---+
or, easier to build, but dangerous (60 Hz at the induction
planes):
o--+----L1/2----+----2C2---+---+
| | | |
gap C1 L2 C3
| | | |
o--+----L1/2----+----2C2---+---+
The values come from the capacitive transformer coil. L2 would be a
suspended resonator coil with influence planes (forming the
capacitances 2C2 with it) at both ends. C3 is formed by the remaining
capacitance across L2.
With direct coupling, the circuit would need two uncoupled
resonators:
o--+----2C1----+----L2/2---+
| | |
gap L1 C2
| | |
o--+----2C1----+----L2/2---+
or (very dangerous due to 60 Hz at the output):
o--+----L1/2----+----L2/2---+
| | |
gap C1 C2
| | |
o--+----L1/2----+----L2/2---+
C2 is the series association of the self-capacitances of the
resonators, with some extra capacitance due to the terminals
and the spark gap that may be added between them. The element
values come from the unbalanced design.
A more efficient system can be in the form of a balanced
transformerless magnifier with a capacitive transformer
at the end:
o--+----2C1----+---L2/2---+---2C3---+---+
| | | | |
gap L1 C2 L3 C4
| | | | |
o--+----2C1----+---L2/2---+---2C3---+---+
or, with two capacitive transformers:
o--+----2C1----+---2C2---+---2C3---+---+
| | | | |
gap L1 L2 L3 C4
| | | | |
o--+----2C1----+---2C2---+---2C3---+---+
All the prototypes can be designed with the program mreshp, at:
http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/programs.
I will have to set up a web page with my comments on Jolyon's ideas.
A lot of circuits already.
Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz