Re: Small coil questions?

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "RIAA/MPAA's Worst Nightmare" <mike.marcum-at-zoomtown-dot-com> 

Thinner is better in my opinion since it makes a given coil run at a lower
freq. (less skin effect losses, as well as a higher surge impedence, which
makes the gap easier to quench with tighter coupling (I normally shoot for
.22-.385, prefferably one of the two, though i need oil for the latter)).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: Small coil questions?


 > Original poster: "Mark W. Stolz" <mark_w_stolz-at-hotmail-dot-com>
 >
 >
 > >Original poster: dhmccauley-at-spacecatlighting-dot-com
 >
 > <snip>
 >
 > >One thing about tesla coiling is that merely copying someone elses design
 > >doesn't necessarily mean a successful design.
 > >Actually, I think you could do better than Gary's secondary.  If i
remember
 > >correctly, he used something like 32 to 36 AWG to wind his secondary
 > >which may be a bit too thin.  Gary himself stated this as well.  I think
28
 > >to 30 AWG wire would be a good size for a mini-coil.
 >
 > Dan,
 >
 > I would have to disagree about 32 AWG being too thin.  Though I use a
 > slightly higher voltage(7.5kV) on our 2.5" small coil, it is wound with 32
 > AWG and produces similiar results.
 > http://teslacoils4christ-dot-org/mark.stolz/2inch/2inch.html
 >
 >
 > Mark Stolz
 > Pearland, TX
 > http://teslacoils4christ-dot-org/
 >
 > >I also have a mini-coil design that has been lately putting out 13" to
14"
 > >streamers to a strike target.  I use the same exact transformer as Gary's
 > >with almost identical
 > >output current (half-shunts removed)
 > >You can get information on my mini-coil at:
 > >
 > >http://www.spacecatlighting-dot-com/teslacoil4.htm
 > >
 > >Dan
 >
 >
 >