[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: failed cap
Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net>
Has anyone tried to use two or three layers of thinner PE dialectric between
plates to allow statistics (of having the defects of those multilayer sheets
line up at a common point) to improve the reliability of the home made cap.
Gerry R
Ft Collins, CO
> Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>
>
>
> Any home brew caps using a relatively thick dielectric (64 mil) is subject
> to this type of failure. You had some small voids in the dielectric.
> Inside these voids the dielectric constant is different from the
surrounding
> material. The result is corona inside the small void. Corona produces
heat
> and eventual failure occurs. Some of these voids are so small they almost
> can not be seen with the human eye. As the corona forms immediately,
> breakdown begins. It's a slow process but eventually the void produces
> dielectric failure as you have experienced.
>
> Professional manufacturers always use 0.5 (1/2) mil thick dielectric
> material to avoid this problem. This dielectric material is so thin it
can
> only be handled by expensive winding machines and can not be touched by
> human hands. The entire surface area of this dielectric material is
checked
> for voids prior to acceptance by the cap mfgr.
>
> I toured Maxwell Capacitors years ago and they use a "clean room" for all
> their special energy discharge cap winding processes. Some of their other
> processes such as soldering extended endfoils together were equally
> interesting.
>
> Stick with the MMC caps and a 2.5:1 ratio (DC to AC) and you will have
> virtually no trouble in the future.
>
> Dr. Resonance
>
> Resonance Research Corporation
> E11870 Shadylane Rd.
> Baraboo WI 53913
> >
> > Hi.
> > i built a cap with 1.6 mm or 64 mil thick PE dielectric and put the
> > whole thing in canola oil. It worked great for a while but while i had
> just
> > the cap across the nst ,,, with no tesla coil connected.. to test my
new
> > mulitgap sparkgap... the PE between 2 of the plates broke down and now
it
> > blows bubbles and hisses and only produces a spark in the gap if the
gap
> is
> > 1 mm or 30 mil . Its pretty much had it and must be breaking down at 1
or
> 2
> > thousand volts..IS it more stressfull on a cap with no tesla coil
> connected
> > and is it suprising my cap did not last in my config. The plates are
1.75"
> > clearance from each end and 1" along the sides. !6 sheets of makes each
> layer
> >
> > Phil
>
>