[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: panasonic mmc rating?
Original poster: "Jason by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <jasonp-at-btinternet-dot-com>
A good plan is to stick to a 3x rating. All the caps that I use in TC
service are now rated for around 40kV, ever since my 25kV MMC went up
firecracker style. Too many volts, and that was from a 10kV neon, with
safety gaps!!!
The theoretical peak output of the NST is 6500V x 1.41 = 9165V. I reckon you
should build your MMC to 20kV, that way it is very unlikely you'll kill it.
Best Regards,
Jason
[UK Geek #1139 Rank G-2]
[HV / Tesla / Laser / Comp]
[ www.thegeekgroup-dot-org ]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:16 PM
Subject: panasonic mmc rating?
> Original poster: "Laurence Davis by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <meknar-at-hotmail-dot-com>
>
> I'm building an mmc using panasonic caps from the same group as
> the ones spec'd in the terry filter. the digikey p/n is p10513-nd.
> I'm building an mmc to replace the single pulse cap that I killed
> in my friends tabletop coil. its using a 6500v/20ma open frame nst
> and the resonant cap is about 8nf. the rms output is .... okay
> my stupid math skills are haunting me... is the rms output 6500 x 1.41
> or 6500 x 2 x 1.41 ? the cap i designed is 2 strings of 9 0.033uf 1600v
> caps. giving a rating of 14.4kv at 7.5nf ( i think, the plans are in the
> other room. )
>
> the question:
> to calc rms output: 6500v x 1.41 = rms output?
> I'd like to overrate the mmc so I would get 6500 x 2 for the target
rating.
>
> also planning on making the mmc into a cube of sorts due to size
> constraints. if cooling becomes an issue, I will place a small fan on one
> end of the cube. the mmc cube will be like this: imagine two strings of
> caps folded length-wise 2 times. 2 wide by 3 high. about a 3" cube.
>
> larry
>
>
>
>