Re: Anyone use MMC's with their pole transformers???????????

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "D.C. Cox by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>


Or, we could call them "Miss Piggy" but some Calif. lawyer would probably
sue us.

Dr. Resonance




----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 2:00 PM
Subject: RE: Anyone use MMC's with their pole transformers???????????


> Original poster: "Dave Hartwick by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <ddhartwick-at-earthlink-dot-net>
>
> Dan,
> I'm not crazy about the term "Pig" either.
>
> I prefer Piglet. Somewhat more affectionate.
>
> Dave Hartwick
>
>
>
> >
> > Actually, not potential transformers are in a class of their own.  Also,
> > what the heck is a pole pig?  They are either distribution transformers
or
> > pole transformers.  Pole pig is an expression which irritates me at
least
> if
> > not more than those who use the terms "muf" and "puf" for microfarads
and
> > picofarads.
>
>
> Dan,
>
> You're likely to encounter much irritation then, because the
> term "pole pig" or just "pig" is very common on the list.  I happen
> to like the term BTW.  It's all part of the fun.  One
> can say they "roasted their pig", or that their "pig weighs
> 240 lbs", or that their "pig is strong", etc.  Any non-Tesla
> folks who heard this would think the pig in question was the type that
> gets sliced into hams and porkchops   :)
>
> John
>
>
>
>