[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Subject*: Re: New Inductance Formula*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>*Date*: Fri, 03 May 2002 11:30:43 -0600*Resent-Date*: Fri, 3 May 2002 11:30:43 -0600*Resent-From*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Resent-Message-ID*: <g-B4W.A.VtD.Cls08-at-poodle>*Resent-Sender*: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Jim Lux by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net> Tesla list wrote: > > Original poster: "David Thomson by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <dave-at-volantis-dot-org> > > Hi Antonio, > > >The inductance of a long solenoid is given, theoretically, by: > eq1 >L=u0*a*N^2/l H > > Where did you find this formula? This is sort of the fundamental definition of inductance of a coil... from first principles. You'll find it in any first year physics text. It is interesting in that it uses metric > units and gives inductance as henry. Not surprising, since mu0 (u0)(permeability of free space) is part of the defintion of SI that hangs all the units together, along with epsilon0 (permittivity of free space), which in turn are tied to the velocity of light. The values are not very accurate, but > it can be modified to give better results. > > eq2 >L=4*pi^2*2.54/100*r^2*N^2/(10*l+9*r) uH This is just a Wheeler type approximation to take into account end effects on a real solenoid (and to convert from inches to meters) Wheeler isn't derived from first principles, so I'm not sure dimensional analysis is appropriate. It's an engineering approximation with (obviously) rounded coefficients. I'd be truly amazed that ANY basic equation has nice integer coefficients like 10 and 9. No... nature is more like 3.1415926535... and 2.71828.... and

- Prev by Date:
**Re: 1/3hp srsg phase adj cap** - Next by Date:
**Re: Frequency vs temperature** - Prev by thread:
**RE: New Inductance Formula** - Next by thread:
**RE: New Inductance Formula** - Index(es):