RE: sorry Big file size for Master Blaster Pic--What size

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "David Kyle by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <dave-at-kyleusa-dot-com>

Interesting gap. I find 600x800 or near that seems a good compromise for
image quality and download speed.

Dave

=========================================
Dave Kyle
Austin, TX USA
Email: dave-at-kyleusa-dot-com


-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 12:57 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: sorry Big file size for Master Blaster Pic--What size

Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<Teslamagnifier-at-aol-dot-com>

Greetings fellow Coilers 
I'd like to get a web site up about my coiling experiences.  Just got a
digital
camera--like a hole in the head--. 
What size picture (ie1200x1600) should one use for web pictures??  I
emailed a
picture of my Master Blaster, and it seemed to take a long time to
upload. 
Sorry if I made anyone wait too long for this stupid picture.  I wonder
if this
camera will take time exposures for sparks (using a tripod)  The print
in the
manual is microscopic. 
Regards 
Bill Shepard