Re: Solenoidal primary BELOW secondary?

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "rheidlebaugh by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <rheidlebaugh-at-zialink-dot-com>

Joyon: I see what wou want to do. I never tried that, but I only see one
problem. Make shure your primary and secondary ground points are together to
avoid racing spark problems. That would put the coils at true 180o phase,
and neutral at the common point.
  Robert  H

> From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:25:34 -0600
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Solenoidal primary BELOW secondary?
> Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:28:30 -0600
> 
> Original poster: "Jolyon Vater Cox by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> <jolyon-at-vatercox.freeserve.co.uk>
> 
> Notwithstanding the fact that problems asssociated with the regular
solenoidal
> primary have persuaded most experimenters to adopt inverted-cone or flat
> pancake primaries -ie the plane of the primary relative to the secondary has
> been moved from 0 to 90 degrees- what would be the effect of taking this to
> its
> logical conclusion and mounting the primary BELOW the base of the secondary,
> that is 180 degrees apart?
> 
> 
> 
>