[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OLTC update

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: OLTC update
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:51:40 -0600
In-Reply-To: <000f01c2411f$7c9f4700$0100a8c0-at-paradise-dot-net.nz>
References: <4.1.20020810212426.00a1da80-at-pop.dnvr.qwest-dot-net>
Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:51:41 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <Q44EiB.A.-PE.PYpV9-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>

Hi Ted,

The 4.7uF 600V caps are the largest in the right range that they make.
They just hapened to turn out matching up to the IGBTs well.  It just sort
of worked out just right ;-)

Cheers,

	Terry

At 10:11 PM 8/11/2002 +1200, you wrote:
>Great scheme to ensure current sharing Terry
>Thought FWIW
>Is it better to use more lower value caps to keep the ESR lower or are the
>10 by 4.7uF caps a good compromise for ESR.
>Best
>Ted L in NZ
>

References:
- OLTC update
  - From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>

Prev by Date: Primary radius inside secondary radius/ elevated secondary?
Next by Date: Re: reason for rf chokes?
Prev by thread: OLTC update
Next by thread: RE: OLTC update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread