Re: Variable Mutual Inductance Primary Tuning (VMIPT Sorry:o)))

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Paul Nicholson by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <paul-at-abelian.demon.co.uk>

Terry wrote:

> I re-ran the test tonight trying to be a bit more careful:
> 
> Distance        Parallel   Anti-parallel
> 1               505 kHz         855 kHz
> 2               535             743
> 3               556             695
> 4               569             666
> 
> Very good agreement with ACMI :-)) 

Yes, that's more like it.

> Althought the anti-parallel case does not seem right for "this"
> use, one never knows when a neat trick like this will
> be needed.  ;-))

Yes, if you're going for this low voltage, high current stuff,
then the occasions when the odd adjustable 'off-axis' L is needed
might arise more frequently. 
--
Paul Nicholson
--