[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Better Spark Gaps

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Better Spark Gaps
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 12:48:39 -0600
Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 12:50:03 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <DEtiGD.A.IjC.J3Hu8-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <FutureT-at-aol-dot-com>

In a message dated 4/13/02 12:19:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
writes:


>
> What if you were to use a TCBOR segmented gap and then set
> it up so that it was a triggered gap, with a trigger
> electrode every other gap segment (or something similar)?
>
> Coiling in Pittsburgh
> Ben McMillen

Ben,

It's unlikely to show any benefit.

Cheers,
John

Prev by Date: Re: Oscilloscope Current Probe
Next by Date: Re: 4-125A, vacuum tube do's and donts
Prev by thread: RE: Better Spark Gaps
Next by thread: RE: Better Spark Gaps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread