[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Theoretically, Cltr/Cres = pi/2/Typo errors?
Original poster: "harvey norris by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <harvich-at-yahoo-dot-com>
--- Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> wrote:
> Original poster: "Ed Phillips by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <evp-at-pacbell-dot-net>
>
> Tesla list wrote:
> >
> > Original poster: "Peter Lawrence by way of Terry
> Fritz
> <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <Peter.Lawrence-at-Sun-dot-com>
> >
> > does anyone believe "L-sec" and "k" are
> "independent of manufacturer"
> > so that tables can be published for typical NSTs
> > 6-30
> > 7.5-30
> > 9-30, 9-60
> > 12-30, 12-60
> > 15-30, 15-60
> >
> > the curious duffer,
> > -Peter Lawrence.
>
> IF the open circuit voltage and short circuit
> current equal to the
> ratings, the leakage inductance referred to the
> secondaries will be very
> close to the same. The leakage REACTANCE will be
> the open circuit
> voltage divided by the short circuit current IN
> AMPS. For a 60 cycle
> transformer the inductance will be the
> reactance/377. So, here's what
> the results would be:
Is one to divide by 377 or as below where 3677 is
used?
The 377 (ohms?)sounds familiar, isnt this the
permeance of free space or something like that? I also
assume the repetition of the 12000 no to be in error.
Can a comment be made as to why one divides by this
no, and whether it is supposed to be 3677 or
377?Thanks for any info or clarification here. HDN
>
> "6-30" X=6000/0.03 = 200,000 ohms
> L=200,000/3677 = 530 henries
I Must be asking an irrevalent question , doing the
math I see that 377 is the no actually used. Can one
indicate why one divides by this no?
> "7.5-30" X=7500/0.03 = 250,000 ohms
> L=250,000/3677 = 663 henries
>
> "9-30" X=9000/0.03 = 200,000 ohms
> L=200,000/3677 = 530 henries
>
> "9-60" X=9000/0.06 = 150,000 ohms
> L=150,000/3677 = 398 henries
>
> "12-30" X=12000/0.03 = 400,000 ohms
> L=400,000/3677 = 1061 henries
>
> "12-60" X=12000/0.06 = 200,000 ohms
> L=200,000/3677 = 530 henries
>
> "15-30" X=12000/0.03 = 500,000 ohms
> L=500,000/3677 = 1326 henries
>
> "16-60" X=12000/0.06 = 200,000 ohms
> L=200,000/3677 = 530 henries
>
> In reality, the core properties and effects of flux
> density may differ,
> resulting in some difference in the inductance,
> which is only an
> approximation at best. "Plenty good enough for
> government work".
>
> I don't think the concept of coupling factor (k) is
> of much value here.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
=====
Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/