Re: TSG Advantages?

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Malcolm Watts by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>

Hi Greg,
         The losses certainly won't be lower, at least on a transfer 
by transfer basis as the discharge path is longer. The major benefits 
would be precise firing timing and ideal quenching, although again it 
obviously comes at a (loss) cost.

Regards,
malcolm

On 29 Aug 2001, at 17:27, Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "Gregory Hunter by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <ghunter31014-at-yahoo-dot-com>
> 
> Dear List,
> 
> Always a settler and never a pioneer. That's me. I was
> probably the last guy on the list to jump on the MMC
> bandwagon, and I never did catch sync rotary fever. So
> now, I feel like the only list regular who isn't
> experimenting with the TSG. This latest honeymoon
> seems like an especially warm one, but I'm wondering,
> what are the advantages of the TSG? Does it offer
> superior performance? Longer sparks? Mechanical
> simplicity? Less gap loss? Why is it preferable to a
> regular air blown gap or an RSG. I'm asking because I
> really don't know. I don't recall reading any mail
> about superior performance for the TSG.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Greg
> http://hot-streamer-dot-com/greg
> <ghunter31014-at-yahoo-dot-com>
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://im.yahoo-dot-com
> 
> 
> 
>