Re: Mutual inductance and K factor

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <tesla123-at-pacbell-dot-net>

Hi John, All,

I remember checking ACMI a while back. I distinctly remember checking MandK
against
measured and ACMI outputs and they all agreed closely. I believe I checked
JHCTES as well
when you included this into your program.

You might want to take another look at some of these measurements and
compare them.

http://www.classictesla-dot-com/temp/k.html

I have a feeling there's an input that's been over-assumed in the use of
either MandK or
JHCTES.

Bart
--
Barton B. Anderson
http://www.classictesla-dot-com


Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<couturejh-at-telocity-dot-com>
>
> Have any coilers used these programs and compared them with
> tests of their coils for the mutual inductance and the K Factor?